<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Math is Hard.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brainsbynight.com/2009/11/20/math-is-hard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brainsbynight.com/2009/11/20/math-is-hard/</link>
	<description>Ordinary Citizen by day, Harvard Student By Night</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:37:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blinder</title>
		<link>http://www.brainsbynight.com/2009/11/20/math-is-hard/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>blinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainsbynight.com/?p=26#comment-3</guid>
		<description>i couldn&#039;t agree more, the art/math being different sides to the same coin. i&#039;m going to make a bit of a leap here, and abstract math out to programming... if i listened to everyone growing up, there is no way i should be a programmer. 

but through *working* at it, i got to be pretty good at it. the same is true with math. math isn&#039;t any different than art. you just have to work at it. 

also with my art/graphics background, i&#039;ve found that i make a better programmer/architect... because i&#039;ve trained my brain to also think in abstracts, of bigger pictures, of being able to see the picture, in its finished state, before its even started. many programmers don&#039;t have this ability and often get mired in the details (which don&#039;t get me wrong, details are important) and lose sight of what the bigger objective. 

so yes, math is learnable as art is learnable. both just take a lot of practice to get good at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i couldn&#8217;t agree more, the art/math being different sides to the same coin. i&#8217;m going to make a bit of a leap here, and abstract math out to programming&#8230; if i listened to everyone growing up, there is no way i should be a programmer. </p>
<p>but through *working* at it, i got to be pretty good at it. the same is true with math. math isn&#8217;t any different than art. you just have to work at it. </p>
<p>also with my art/graphics background, i&#8217;ve found that i make a better programmer/architect&#8230; because i&#8217;ve trained my brain to also think in abstracts, of bigger pictures, of being able to see the picture, in its finished state, before its even started. many programmers don&#8217;t have this ability and often get mired in the details (which don&#8217;t get me wrong, details are important) and lose sight of what the bigger objective. </p>
<p>so yes, math is learnable as art is learnable. both just take a lot of practice to get good at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
